Business Purpose Declaration: What You Are Signing, and What It Gives Up
It is one page in the finance pack and most people sign it without reading. It is also the document that moves your loan out of the consumer credit framework, which is a reasonable thing to do when it is accurate, and a criminal matter for whoever pushed it when it is not.
The short answer
A business purpose declaration is a statement, made before you enter a credit contract, that the credit will be applied wholly or predominantly for a purpose that is not a purpose covered by the National Credit Code. Making one creates a presumption that the credit is not consumer credit, which takes the transaction outside the Code and therefore outside the responsible lending obligations in Chapter 3 of the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 and outside Best Interests Duty. The presumption is not absolute. The declaration is ineffective if the credit provider knew or had reason to believe, or would have had reason to believe on reasonable inquiries, that the credit was in fact predominantly for a Code purpose, and it must be substantially in the form the regulations require. Inducing someone to make a declaration that is false or misleading in a material particular is an offence carrying up to 2 years imprisonment.
What a business purpose declaration is
If you have taken commercial finance in Australia, you have signed one. It is usually a single page in the pack, often headed something like “Declaration of Purpose”, and it says in substance that the credit you are taking will be used wholly or predominantly for business or investment purposes rather than personal ones.
Most people treat it as administrative. It is not. It is the document that determines which body of law governs the transaction, and almost everything else about the deal follows from it: what the lender had to check before lending to you, what the broker owed you, what happens if you fall behind, and where you can complain.
The mechanics sit in section 13 of the National Credit Code, which is Schedule 1 to the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009. To understand what the declaration is doing, you have to start with the test it exists to answer.
The test it exists to answer
The National Credit Code does not apply to all credit. It applies where four things are true at the time the contract is entered into, or proposed to be entered into:
- the debtor is a natural person or a strata corporation; and
- the credit is provided or intended to be provided wholly or predominantly for personal, domestic or household purposes, or to purchase, renovate or improve residential property for investment purposes, or to refinance credit provided wholly or predominantly for that residential investment purpose; and
- a charge is or may be made for providing the credit; and
- the credit provider provides the credit in the course of a business of providing credit carried on in this jurisdiction, or as part of or incidentally to another business carried on in this jurisdiction.
The second condition is the purpose test, and it is where business finance parts company with consumer finance. Note what it does not say. There is no clause excluding business lending. Business-purpose credit does not get carved out of the Code. It simply never satisfies the test that brings credit into the Code in the first place.
That distinction sounds academic and is not. It explains why the framework is structured around a declaration rather than an exemption form. Nobody is applying to be let out of something. The question is whether the transaction was ever in.
One further point in the same section is worth holding onto, because it catches people out: for the purposes of that test, investment by the debtor is not a personal, domestic or household purpose. The one investment purpose the Code does reach is residential property. Buying shares, funding a business, or acquiring an income-producing asset is not consumer credit, whether or not you think of yourself as a consumer while doing it.
Business finance is not consumer finance with the protections switched off. It was never inside the consumer framework to begin with. The declaration is how everyone agrees on that, in advance and in writing.
What “predominantly” actually means
The test turns on the word predominantly, and unusually for this kind of drafting, the Code defines it rather than leaving it to argument.
The predominant purpose for which credit is provided is the purpose for which more than half of the credit is intended to be used. Where the credit is intended to be used to obtain goods or services for different purposes, it is the purpose for which the goods or services are intended to be most used.
So it is a majority test, applied to intended use, assessed at the time the contract is entered into. Not a majority of your motivation. Not what you told the lender. More than half of the money, or most of the use of the thing the money buys.
On a prime mover working six days a week, that is not a close question. On a dual-cab that tows a work trailer on weekdays and a boat on weekends, it can be genuinely close, and it is worth being honest with yourself about the split before anyone hands you a form.
What the declaration does, and when it fails
Section 13 does two things, and the second is the part almost nobody explains.
First, it sets the default the other way. In proceedings where a party claims that a credit contract, mortgage or guarantee is one to which the Code applies, it is presumed to be such unless the contrary is established. The starting position, in other words, is that the consumer framework applies.
Second, the declaration reverses that presumption. If the debtor declares, before entering the contract, that the credit is to be applied wholly or predominantly for a purpose that is not a Code purpose, then it is presumed the credit is not for a Code purpose, unless the contrary is established.
That is the whole function of the document. It flips a presumption. It does not change the facts, and it does not bind anyone to a conclusion.
The three ways a declaration fails
The presumption has limits written into the same section, and they are the useful part for anyone being handed a form to sign.
The lender knew, or should have asked. The declaration is ineffective if, when it was made, the credit provider or a prescribed person knew or had reason to believe, or would have known or had reason to believe had they made reasonable inquiries about the purpose of the credit, that the credit was in fact to be applied wholly or predominantly for a Code purpose. The second limb is the one with teeth. A lender cannot protect itself by not asking. Deliberate incuriosity is treated the same as knowledge.
The form is wrong. A declaration must be substantially in the form required by the regulations, and is ineffective for the purposes of the section if it is not.
And if it fails, the Code applies anyway. Where the declaration is ineffective, the purpose limb of the test is taken to be satisfied in relation to the contract. Not “may be reconsidered”. Taken to be satisfied. The transaction is consumer credit, retrospectively, with everything that entails for a lender who assessed it as though it were not.
The criminal provision
There is one more subsection and it changes the character of the whole document. A person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that induces a debtor to make a declaration under that section which is false or misleading in a material particular, and the declaration is false or misleading in a material particular. The criminal penalty is 2 years imprisonment, and strict liability applies to the element that the declaration was in fact false or misleading.
Read that in the context of a sales conversation. If someone tells you to tick the business box on a vehicle that is really the family car, because it makes the approval easier or the paperwork lighter, they are not offering you a shortcut. They are engaging in conduct that induces a false declaration, and the law does not require them to have known it was false for the offence element about falsity to bite.
What you give up by signing an accurate one
Assume the declaration is true and the finance genuinely is for business. You have still stepped outside a body of protections, and it is worth knowing which ones, because the trade is usually a good one and you should be able to say why.
| What applies to regulated consumer credit | Where it comes from | On business-purpose credit |
|---|---|---|
| Responsible lending obligations, including assessing whether the contract is unsuitable | Chapter 3, National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 | Does not apply |
| Best Interests Duty on a broker providing credit assistance | NCCP Act, from 1 January 2021 | Does not apply |
| Right to give a hardship notice and have a change to the contract considered | National Credit Code, section 72 | Does not apply |
| Default notice with at least 30 days to remedy before enforcement proceedings | National Credit Code, section 88 | Does not apply |
The hardship and default provisions are the ones operators feel. Under the Code, a debtor who considers they are or will be unable to meet their obligations may give the credit provider a hardship notice, orally or in writing, and there is a process the credit provider has to run: it may request relevant information within 21 days, and it must give notice of its decision. It is not obliged to agree, and the Code itself notes that it need not, particularly where it does not believe there is reasonable cause or reasonably believes the debtor could not meet the obligations even if the contract changed. But the process exists and it is enforceable.
Similarly, a credit provider generally must not begin enforcement proceedings against a defaulting debtor unless it has given a default notice allowing at least 30 days from the date of the notice to remedy the default, and the default has not been remedied in that period. There are defined exceptions, including where the provider reasonably believes it was induced by fraud, where the debtor cannot be located, where a court authorises it, or where mortgaged goods have been or are about to be removed or disposed of without permission.
On business-purpose finance, none of that statutory scaffolding is there. What governs instead is your contract, the general law, and the lender’s own commercial policy. That is why the terms are more flexible in your favour on the way in, and less forgiving on the way out.
Commercial finance trades protection for flexibility. That is a defensible trade for a business asset. It is a bad trade for a family car, and it is not yours to make on someone else’s behalf.
Two things do not disappear. A licensed broker still operates under the conditions of its Australian Credit Licence. And a broker arranging both a home loan and a commercial facility for the same client carries Best Interests Duty on the first and not the second. Two files, two frameworks, same person across the desk.
Not sure which side of the line your finance sits on?
Bring the pack. We will tell you whether the purpose test is straightforward on your facts, what the declaration in front of you is actually asserting, and what that means for the terms you are being offered. Our licence is ACL 390611, searchable on ASIC’s professional registers. What we charge you: nothing, on any loan type.
The dual-use problem
Most declarations are straightforward. The hard cases are assets that genuinely do both jobs, and they cluster in a few places.
- Dual-cab utes and light commercials. The classic. Work vehicle Monday to Friday, family vehicle on the weekend. The test is intended use, and more than half of it.
- Vehicles bought in a personal name for a business that is not incorporated. A sole trader is a natural person, which satisfies the first condition of the test. Whether the Code applies still turns entirely on purpose, not on whose name is on the contract.
- Property borrowing where the purpose is mixed. Residential investment property is inside the Code. Commercial property is not. Borrowing against a home to fund a business is business-purpose credit even though the security is residential.
- Refinances that change purpose. The purpose is assessed on the new contract, not inherited from the old one.
That third one deserves emphasis because it is the most common misunderstanding in the whole area: the security is not the purpose. What the loan is secured against tells you nothing about which framework applies. A loan secured by the family home to buy a delivery van is business-purpose credit. A loan secured by a commercial unit to fund a home renovation is not.
If the declaration does not match the truth
Practical guidance, in order.
Read it before you sign it. It will be a short document and it will say what it says. If the wording asserts something about your intended use that is not accurate, the accurate response is to correct the facts, not to sign and hope.
Do not let anyone tell you it is a formality. The section that creates the presumption is the same section that creates the offence. Anyone in the industry treating the document as boilerplate is telling you something about how they work.
If the split is close, say so. A lender that asks the question and records the answer is protecting both of you. A lender that would rather not know is creating the exact circumstance in which the declaration becomes ineffective, because the test looks at what they would have had reason to believe had they made reasonable inquiries.
If the finance really is consumer credit, take it as consumer credit. The assessment will be more searching and the process slower. That is the protection working, not friction to be engineered around.
If you think a declaration you have already made was wrong, get advice. This page is general information, and the consequences run in several directions at once, including for the credit provider. That is a conversation for a solicitor, not a broker and not a website.
Where this comes up in practice
Four places, in roughly descending order of frequency.
Asset and vehicle finance. Every commercial vehicle, truck, trailer and item of plant financed to an ABN holder. Our guide to truck and transport finance covers how the structures work once the framework question is settled, and chattel mortgage covers the most common of them.
Unsecured and cashflow business lending. Where the purpose is self-evidently business, the declaration is uncontroversial and the absence of the consumer framework is precisely what allows the speed. See unsecured commercial loans and cashflow loans.
Borrowing against a home for a business purpose. The security is residential and the purpose is not, which surprises people every time.
Low documentation lending. The reduced verification available on some commercial products exists because the commercial framework permits it. That is the same trade described above, made visible.
Across all of them, the useful discipline is the same. Work out the predominant purpose honestly first. Let the framework follow from it. Do not pick the framework you want and reverse-engineer the purpose to reach it, because that is the sequence the offence provision is aimed at.
Read Intellect Finance’s Google reviews
If you are deciding who to ask about this, these are pulled live from our Google Business Profile, real and unedited, and you can check them on Google rather than taking our word for it.
These reviews reflect other clients’ experiences. They are not a promise of any particular outcome for your finance, which will always depend on your circumstances and the lender’s assessment.
Frequently Asked
Business Purpose Declaration FAQs
What borrowers ask before signing the declaration in a commercial finance pack.
What is a business purpose declaration?
It is a statement made by the borrower, before entering the credit contract, that the credit is to be applied wholly or predominantly for a purpose that is not a purpose covered by the National Credit Code. Making it creates a presumption that the credit is not consumer credit, unless the contrary is established. That presumption is what places the transaction outside the consumer credit framework, and it is set out in section 13 of the Code.
Do I have to sign one to get a business loan?
In practice, yes, for credit taken predominantly for business purposes. Lenders rely on the declaration to establish which framework governs the transaction and to assess the file accordingly. What matters is that it is accurate. A declaration that reflects how the funds will genuinely be used is unremarkable. One that does not is a problem for you and a potential offence for whoever induced it.
What does “wholly or predominantly” mean?
The Code defines it. The predominant purpose is the purpose for which more than half of the credit is intended to be used. Where the credit is used to obtain goods or services for different purposes, it is the purpose for which those goods or services are intended to be most used. It is a majority test applied to intended use at the time the contract is entered into, not a test of what you had in mind generally.
Does responsible lending apply to a business loan?
No, where the credit is provided wholly or predominantly for business purposes. The responsible lending obligations sit in Chapter 3 of the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 and attach to credit regulated by the National Credit Code. Business-purpose credit does not satisfy the purpose test that brings credit into the Code, so those obligations never attach to it. The lender’s own commercial credit policy governs the assessment instead.
Does Best Interests Duty apply to commercial or asset finance?
Best Interests Duty applies to mortgage brokers in relation to credit assistance provided on regulated consumer credit, and has done since 1 January 2021. It does not extend to lending taken predominantly for business purposes. If the same broker is arranging both a home loan and a commercial facility for you, the duty applies to the home loan and not to the commercial facility. Licensed brokers still operate under the conditions of their credit licence on both.
Can a business purpose declaration be challenged or set aside?
The presumption it creates applies unless the contrary is established, so yes. The declaration is also ineffective if, when it was made, the credit provider or a prescribed person knew or had reason to believe, or would have known or had reason to believe had they made reasonable inquiries about the purpose, that the credit was in fact predominantly for a Code purpose. It is ineffective as well if it is not substantially in the form required by the regulations. Where it is ineffective, the purpose limb of the test is taken to be satisfied and the Code applies to the contract.
What happens if someone pressures me to sign a false declaration?
It is an offence. A person commits an offence if they engage in conduct that induces a debtor to make a declaration under that section which is false or misleading in a material particular, and the declaration is false or misleading in a material particular. The criminal penalty is up to 2 years imprisonment, and strict liability applies to the element concerning whether the declaration was in fact false or misleading. If you are being encouraged to declare a business purpose for something that is not one, do not sign, and consider getting advice.
My loan is secured by my house but funds my business. Which framework applies?
The purpose governs, not the security. Credit taken predominantly to fund a business is business-purpose credit even where the security is the family home, and it sits outside the National Credit Code. The reverse also holds: borrowing secured against a commercial property for a personal purpose can be regulated credit. This is the single most common misunderstanding in the area, and it is worth confirming with the lender in writing rather than assuming.
What about a dual-cab ute used for work and family?
This is the genuinely close case and it should be answered honestly rather than conveniently. The test is the purpose for which the goods are intended to be most used. If the vehicle is predominantly a work vehicle, a business purpose declaration reflects that. If it is predominantly a family vehicle that occasionally carries tools, it does not, and signing one anyway is the situation the offence provision is aimed at. Where the split is close, tell the lender and let them record it.
Is investment borrowing consumer credit?
Generally not, with one significant exception. The Code states that investment by the debtor is not a personal, domestic or household purpose. The exception written into the purpose test is residential property: credit to purchase, renovate or improve residential property for investment, or to refinance such credit, is inside the Code. Other investment borrowing, including commercial property and business acquisition, is not.
The bottom line
The declaration is a presumption-shifting document, not a formality and not an exemption. It says the credit is predominantly for a purpose the National Credit Code does not cover, and because the Code’s default position is that it does apply, the declaration is what moves the transaction the other way.
Three things follow. If the declaration is accurate, the commercial framework is the right one and the flexibility you get in the terms is the other side of the protections you do not get in hardship and default. If it is inaccurate and the lender knew or should have asked, it is ineffective and the Code applies anyway, retrospectively. And if someone induced it knowing it was wrong, that is a criminal provision rather than a commercial dispute.
The useful discipline is sequencing. Work out the predominant purpose first, honestly, using the more-than-half test. Let the framework follow. The failure mode in this area is always the reverse: choosing the framework that makes the deal easier and then describing the purpose to fit it.
Joseph Sukkar
Joseph founded Intellect Finance in Penrith in 2005 and has worked in Australian finance for more than 25 years, across residential, commercial and asset lending. He has signed off on both sides of this line many times, and the firm’s position is the one set out above: work out the purpose first and let the framework follow. Intellect Finance charges clients no fee on any loan type. More about the team.
Sources
National Credit Code, Schedule 1 to the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009, section 5, for the four conditions under which the Code applies to the provision of credit, the statement that investment by the debtor is not a personal, domestic or household purpose, and the definition of predominant purpose as the purpose for which more than half the credit is intended to be used or, where goods or services are obtained for different purposes, the purpose for which they are intended to be most used. legislation.gov.au
National Credit Code, section 13, for the presumption that a contract is one to which the Code applies unless the contrary is established, the reversing presumption created by a declaration made before entering the contract, the circumstances rendering a declaration ineffective including where the credit provider would have had reason to believe otherwise on reasonable inquiries, the consequence that the purpose limb is then taken to be satisfied, the requirement that the declaration be substantially in the form required by the regulations, and the offence of engaging in conduct that induces a false or misleading declaration, carrying a criminal penalty of 2 years imprisonment with strict liability applying to the falsity element. legislation.gov.au
National Credit Code, section 72, for the hardship notice process, the credit provider’s ability to request relevant information within 21 days, the obligation to give notice of its decision, and the note that the credit provider need not agree to change the contract. Section 88, for the requirement to give a default notice allowing at least 30 days from the date of the notice to remedy the default before beginning enforcement proceedings, and the exceptions to that requirement. legislation.gov.au
National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009, Chapter 3, for the responsible lending conduct obligations applying to credit licensees in relation to regulated credit. legislation.gov.au
ASIC, Regulatory Guide 273 Mortgage brokers: Best interests duty, for the scope of the duty applying to mortgage brokers in relation to credit assistance on regulated consumer credit from 1 January 2021. asic.gov.au
Important disclosures, general advice warning and licensing
General information only. This article is general information only and does not constitute financial, credit, legal or tax advice. It does not take your personal or business circumstances into account. Before acting on any information here, consider whether it is appropriate to your objectives, financial situation and needs.
This is not legal advice, and the subject matter is legal. This page summarises statutory provisions as they stood when reviewed on 10 September 2026. It does not set out every provision, exception, transitional rule or regulation that may bear on a particular contract, and the application of these provisions to any specific transaction depends on its facts. Whether credit is regulated, whether a declaration is effective, and what follows from either are questions for your solicitor and, where relevant, the credit provider. If you believe a declaration you have made was inaccurate, obtain legal advice rather than acting on this page.
Best Interests Duty. Best Interests Duty applies to mortgage brokers in relation to the credit assistance they provide, at the time it is provided, on regulated consumer credit under the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009. It is a conduct standard rather than a guarantee of outcome, does not override lender policy, and is not an ongoing obligation to monitor a loan after settlement. It does not extend to lending taken predominantly for business purposes.
Lender policies vary and change. Documentation requirements, declaration forms, assessment criteria and approval timeframes differ between lenders, are subject to each lender’s own assessment, and change without notice. This page names no lenders and publishes no interest rates. No broker can guarantee loan approval, a particular interest rate, or a timeframe.
What we charge you. Nothing, on any loan type. No arrangement fee for residential, commercial, corporate, asset, SMSF or personal lending, no fee for complex or specialist lending, and no clawback recovery fee if a loan is discharged early. Lenders pay us a commission on settlement, disclosed to you in writing in our Credit Guide before we provide credit assistance. This statement describes Intellect Finance only, and other brokers’ arrangements are set out in their own Credit Guides.
About the reviews shown. The reviews displayed on this page are genuine reviews published by clients on Intellect Finance’s Google Business Profile, shown live via a third-party reviews widget. They reflect those individuals’ own experiences and are not a promise of any particular outcome.
Other professionals. Tax questions to your accountant or a registered tax agent. Contracts, declarations, guarantees and security documents to your solicitor. If you are having difficulty meeting repayments, contact your lender’s hardship team, and free independent help is available from the National Debt Helpline on 1800 007 007.
Intellect Finance Pty Ltd holds Australian Credit Licence 390611 and is a member of the MFAA and AFCA. Lending criteria, fees and terms apply. All applications are subject to lender assessment and approval. Article checked 10 September 2026.
Next Reads
Related guides
Free Finance Review
Read the pack with someone who knows what is in it.
Book a free 15 minute call. We will tell you whether the purpose test is straightforward on your facts, what framework your finance sits in and why, and what that means for the terms in front of you. Nothing gets submitted until you decide. Penrith since 2005, clients Australia-wide. ACL 390611. No fee on any loan type.
General information only, and not legal advice. Intellect Finance publishes no interest rates. Questions about a specific declaration or contract to your solicitor.